Photo by Gabriela Natiello on Unsplash

Looking At Contrail Formation in Australian Skies

What are those white lines in the air next to planes? This website will document my findings as I look at where, when and why contrails form in Australian skies.

A summary of my findings so far

Research question: Where and when do flights in Australian skies pass through contrail-forming air, and what would avoiding it involve for regional and FIFO charter flights?

Data: Contrail forecasts from the Google Contrails API (a 0–4 severity index from a weather-forecast model) for winter 2025 and April 2026, matched with ADS-B flight tracks from ADSB.fi and BITRE domestic route statistics.

Key findings:

  • The contrail forcing index over Australian skies in winter 2025 was highest overnight (14 UTC, midnight AEST) and lowest around midday (02 UTC): Entry 3. Matched flight data from April 2026 showed the same overnight pattern, with the share of aircraft in contrail-forming air peaking at 15 UTC: Entry 7
  • Some regions of interest were identified when pairing contrail forcing index with air traffic data: Hobart to Melbourne over the Bass Strait (the most contrail-prone route per flight, 2.5x Melbourne to Sydney), the Melbourne to Sydney corridor and interior WA: Entry 5, Entry 6, Entry 7, Entry 8
  • In WA, 2.1% of fly-in, fly-out (FIFO) flights passed through contrail-forming air compared with 2.9% of non-FIFO flights. This small difference is not yet statistically significant, but could possibly be explained by the smaller aircraft used for many FIFO operations: Entry 10, Entry 11
  • On the Melbourne to Sydney corridor, Melbourne–Sydney flights were in contrail-forming air at about 3.9x the rate their share of traffic would predict: Entry 12. However, most of the hits captured across four days were mostly attributed to two of the days, so more data is needed to confirm these results.

How I Measured Contrail Exposure:
In all of my entries so far, I have used different measures to assess contrail risk. These include:

  • Mean CFI: average contrail forcing index score (0-4) over the whole period
  • Exposure Index: how busy a square is (air traffic) multiplied by how often it has contrail conditions, both scaled from 0-1
  • Per-flight route score: draws a straight path between 2 airports and averages the contrail risk of every square it crosses
  • Compound Risk Score: how many aircraft sightings multiplied by average CFI score (with more refined data compared to Exposure Index)
  • Share of At-Risk Sightings: percentage of all aircraft sightings inside a contrail-forming square at that moment
  • Hit Rate: percentage of sightings in contrail-forming air split by route group
  • Per-Flight Hit Rate: percentage of flights with at least one sighting in contrail-forming air

Limitations: Short data windows, rough FIFO labelling, the Google Contrails data is the output of a model rather than data containing actual contrails.

Next steps: collecting more days and months of matching ADSB.fi & Contrails data to test whether FIFO and SYD-MEL results hold up, looking at small altitude or departure-time changes for at-risk FIFO flights, improved labeling of FIFO vs non-FIFO flights, looking at altitude changes in main routes for Melbourne-Sydney route, matching traffic data and contrails data for the Hobart to Melbourne route, looking at Tasman Sea routes between Australia and New Zealand.

The entries below show the findings in more detail, from first look at the data to the latest analysis.

Posts

subscribe via RSS